Re: Wingfield Coats-of-Hands
The Tickencote photo seems to big date off at the very least 1650 according so you’re able to page 3of Specific Ideas of your own Wingfield Family unit members by the Wingfield, John M.London: Murray, 1925 republished of the Wingfield Members of the family Society inside the 1991. ISBN0-937543-03-9.
“Sir Robert Wyngfeld off Letheringham, their [Sir Robert whom d. ily off half dozen or 7 sons and you can fivedaughters, and is out of your, with his pupils and grandchildren,exactly who played zero small part regarding issues of world out-of The united kingdomt, that thepresent works [Wingfield’s publication] treats.
His oldest young man is Sir John Wyngfeld out of Letheringham, Knight, whom, that have hiswife, form the two main rates from the old pedigree oil images whichprovide the subject of this info.
There are 2 of these oictures in existence, almost identically alike, oneat Tickencote Hallway, Rutland, together with almost every other on Boughton House, Northants. Itis as yet not known which is the totally new and which is the content.
Which couples are surrounded throughout the finest and you will bottom records by the all their sixteen college students, during the each case Wingfield quarters (1) Bosville and you can (2) quarterly, Goushell therefore the chequy finish
The main one in the Tickncote, now belonging to Lieut.-Col. John MauriceWingfield, try painted with the canvas, possesses most likely already been through it while the about1650, since it is most likely that it is the house of history SirRobert Wingfield out-of Upton, from inside the Northamptonshire, that is considered has actually diedduring the new commonwealth, and many of whoever oils paintings got in the thattime eliminated to his cousin’s home during the Tickencote, when Upton is actually offered, andwhich will always be there.”
The writer states you to “the image from inside the Boughton home could easily be tracedback so you can 1677” (page cuatro) and supply a few comments regarding mid 1700srefering to direction of visualize and its presentation to the Duke ofMontague.
The author claims into webpage six one to “When, or from the whose purchase, otherwise because of the whom they waspainted, is still a concern undecided by the masters.”
Again, my concerns toward classification cardiovascular system not in the genealogicalconnections out of the players, (the Wingfields were explored fairlywell, and you will despite my typo to the Howard family relations, I really do feel the pedigreeaccurately annotated within RI) but into reasoning from which shields weredisplayed because of the latter a few years. I believe We have a sense of what”should” get on the respective shields, and you will am thinking as to why, in this instance,that does not appear to be what is actually found. Often I am misleading inside the myunderstanding, and/or Wingfield’s had been to play fairly punctual and you may sagging withtheir possession for almost all objective hence we possibly may not yet know.
Kelly, thanks for delivering me personally images, and you may due to Tim to have protecting myself the trouble away from putting them on the net. Looking this more plus the pedigrees inside Viscount Powerscourt’s _Muniments of Ancient Saxon Category of Wingfield_, the organization is actually obvious to me; what’s more, it seems that there clearly was one to blazing heraldic error, right in the guts, possibly the source of your misunderstandings. I can acknowledge I haven’t twice-seemed all of the children’s impalings and that i get one almost every other unanswered question (what’s the coroneted lozenge about straight down register?). Brand new red-colored traces seem to superimposed with this image on book are not such as helpful, and also the annotated ‘key’ doesn’t indeed reproduce the text captions and you may doesn’t determine anyone whose arms get.
There are 2 interesting factors to the picture recommending several various other centers. Basic, it focuses on a fifteenth-century wedding and you can shows the children of online lottery pickup line the wedding, but zero later matter. Next, it suggests an equity branch that have lineage right down to the fresh seventeenth century.
The central panel is the relationship out-of Sir John Wingfield (d. 1481) so you can Elizabeth, dau. off Sir John Fitz Lewis and you can Anne (Montacute). Both figures kneel in the middle, and therefore are surmounted because of the impalings of the parents’ hands in wreaths. The latest heraldic error is here now, given that Sir John’s dad’s completion one another household and you can impales Gousell (indeed, Gousell quartered using this chequy coat). This really is an error. It is obvious that quartering away from Gousell and also the chequy coating will come in when this occurs, so it can not be each other quartered and impaled regarding wreath (until, by implication, Sir John who d. 1481 got drawn a keen Oedipus and partnered their own mom). Something Really don’t accept ‘s the coroneted lozenge hanging over the pupils throughout the lower register.
