Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Yards. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you may People Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The area out of accessory when you look at the person mating. Post on Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Internet sites contradiction reviewed. Diary from Societal Products, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites paradox: A personal tech you to definitely decreases societal engagement and you will psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.M., & Industries, J. Meters. (2001). Matter, time, and you will duration of marriages and divorces. Newest Population Records, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research out-of closeness, passion, and connection: Review brand new presumptions of the triangular idea of love. Mental Profile, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Effect greatest about creating tough: Societal reviews within this romantic dating. Journal out of Identity and Public Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: Brand new implicit cognition from romantic rivalry. Record from Personality and Societal Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
An effective. (2001)mitment and you can relationship maintenance mechanisms
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. Good., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you can attractive possibilities: The fresh new evolved psychology regarding relationships maintenance. Progression and you may Peoples Choices, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential analysis out-of conflict and agreement within the upset and you may nondistressed marital lovers. Journal from Consulting and you can Logical Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A good., Green, A beneficial. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Dating development on the internet: What’s the big destination? Journal from Public Activities, 58(1), 9–30.
Some great benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and also the framework from fulfillment within the intimate relationship
Neff, L. A good., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-comparison purposes inside the romantic dating: A style of around the globe enhancement and you may particular verification. Inside the P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Insights ents regarding the study of couples telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge University Drive.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-counselor bond from contact of connection theory. Psychotherapy: Theory, Lookup, Habit, Knowledge, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). New public overseeing system: Increased sensitiveness to personal cues since an adaptive response to public exemption. From inside the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh new social outcast: Ostracism, social exemption, rejection, and you may intimidation (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Mindset Push.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Around the world and you may particular relational models on contact with personal relations. Log out of Personality and you will Public Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A good., Tran, S., ). Accessory and suggestions seeking to inside the romantic relationships. Character and Personal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you can specific attachment representations when you look at the adulthood: Can there be a romance?. Record From Personal And private Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Inside the J. Harvey & A great. Wenzel (Eds.), Close personal matchmaking: Repairs and you will enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A beneficial. D. (2000). Projection physically perception certainly spouses because a purpose of this new similarity within their shared experience. Identity And you can Public Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience regarding extrinsic advantages on taste and you may enjoying. Log off Identification and you will Social Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.
